Law 122 Ethics Essay

The facts of the case between Bob and Martha disclose that both parties face ethical and legal obligations, and may contradict ones duty to act. This essay will pertain to Bob’s ethical and legal duty in his situation with Martha. The issue of this case is as follows; does Bob have an obligation to pay Martha $1000, after she referred him to Raj? This issue is the basis to Bob’s ethical and legal argument. Ones moral duty may be contingent upon different personal, social and religious factors, to determine a course of action to take in perplex situations. Bobs decision to not fulfill his promise to Martha, conflict with his ethical obligations as a business owner and member of Toronto Builders and Real Estate Association. Deontological-based reasoning is one of the four types of ethical reasoning. This theory states that people should adhere to their obligations and duties when analyzing an ethical dilemma. This means that a

2[Type text] [Type text] [Type text] Ellie and Guy are business owners with different specialties. Ellie makes clothes and requires unusual materials and Guy specializes in ‘high quality, hard to find fabrics’ 1 , so they agree on a price and delivery. When Guy realizes his supplier raised the price, he asked Ellie if she could pay more. Ellie agrees to pay the higher price so her business relationship is not ruined, but later fails to pay the promised price because her sales drop. When Guy brings it up, Ellie refuses to pay because she is obligated to their original price. Due to the parties only making an agreement, it becomes a gratuitous promise, a promise for which nothing of legal value is given in exchange 2 , and the ethical reasoning being fairness and justice, which states, “we should pay our debts and treat like cases alike” 3 . Regarding to legality, Ellie promised to pay for the price increment but she failed

0 thoughts on “Law 122 Ethics Essay”


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *